…was what their van should have said – they were laying some high-friction red asphalt on the road by one of the crossing points in Milton. I’m not sure that ‘Caution: white-lining’ really gives out that much better a message, though.
Today I crossed the river and walked to the next village east – Horningsea. On the way I passed a field of grain, you can see where the rabbits live because there are near perfect semicircles of trampled grain around each of their warrens.
Horningsea itself is a tedious village, theres no commerce there except for a garden centre and a couple of pubs. Still, at least it hasn’t suffered the kind of hideous expansion Milton has had, there are a few new-builds, but they’re mostly on the higher end of the market and fairly sympathetic to the area – I suspect its more on flood plain than Milton, but not by much, surely?
I stopped at the garden centre for a ‘comfort break’ on the way home – I thought I’d take a look at their offerings for improving the interior of my house. I was told the other day that my house looks rather more practical than romantic – to which my response was that I spend far more time being functional than being romantic, so that was a reasonable way for it to be[0]. And its got to be said that after looking at the things on offer to make it more romantic theres is a very real chance that nothing is going to change. I was also appalled at the price of rakes.
What do you think – what should the house of a single man look like? Should he spend a lot of time and effort turning it into some kind of chick magnet? Or would it be more sensible for it to be practical and functional? How does what peoples houses look like affect what you think of the people that live there? What should I do to improve the interior of my house?
[0] Yes, I know this is man-logic, but its what I know…
43 comments