Octave packages test results

Having set up a build of octave packages, I have now added a mechanism to test them. This is currently quite crude and probably doesn’t really reflect the actual state of the packages.

Package	Maintained	Version	Successful	Run	Pass
actuarial	No	1.1.0	Yes	16	0
ad	No		No	0	0
ann	No		No	0	0
audio	No	1.1.4	Yes	12	3
benchmark	No	1.1.1	Yes	16	0
bim	Yes	1.1.4	Yes	53	9
bioinfo	No	0.1.2	Yes	9	4
cgi	Yes	1.0.1	Yes	5	0
civil-engineering	No	1.0.7	Yes	7	0
communications	Yes	1.2.1	Yes	100	52
control	Yes	2.8.0	Yes	130	0
data-smoothing	Yes	1.3.0	Yes	9	1
database	Yes	2.3.1	Yes	13	0
dataframe	Yes	1.1.0	Yes	6	0
dicom	Yes	0.1.1	Yes	4	0
divand	Yes	1.1.2	Yes	75	0
econometrics	Yes	1.1.1	Yes	35	0
engine	No	1.0.9	Yes	6	0
fem-fenics	Yes		No	0	0
fenv	No	0.1.0	Yes	9	3
financial	Yes	0.4.0	Yes	75	2
fits	Yes	1.0.6	Yes	4	0
fixed	–		No	0	0
fl-core	Yes		No	0	0
fpl	Yes	1.3.4	Yes	15	2
fuzzy-logic-toolkit	Yes	0.4.5	Yes	61	17
ga	Yes	0.10.0	Yes	27	6
galois	–		No	0	0
general	Yes	1.3.4	Yes	14	3
generate_html	Yes	0.1.7	Yes	13	0
generate_latex	–	0.0.1	Yes	8	0
geometry	Yes	1.7.0	Yes	13	0
gnuplot	No	1.0.3	Yes	32	2
graceplot	–		No	0	0
graph	–	0.0.0	Yes	5	0
gsl	No	1.1.0	Yes	11	0
image-acquisition	Yes	0.2.1	Yes	12	0
image	Yes	2.3.0	Yes	132	8
informationtheory	No	0.1.8	Yes	32	26
instrument-control	Yes	0.2.1	Yes	13	0
integration	No	1.0.7	Yes	37	1
interval	Yes	0.1.5	Yes	14	0
io	Yes	2.2.7	Yes	42	0
irsa	No	1.0.7	Yes	19	7
java	Yes		No	0	0
jhandles	–		No	0	0
level-set	Yes		No	0	0
linear-algebra	Yes	2.2.2	Yes	25	2
lssa	Yes	0.1.2	Yes	14	0
ltfat	Yes		No	0	0
macosx	–		No	0	0
mapping	No	1.2.0	Yes	45	0
mechanics	Yes	1.3.1	Yes	10	0
miscellaneous	Yes	1.2.1	Yes	37	1
missing-functions	No	1.0.2	Yes	9	0
mpi	Yes		No	0	0
msh	Yes	1.0.10	Yes	25	7
multicore	No	0.2.15	Yes	21	0
multi-precision	–		No	0	0
mvn	Yes	1.1.0	Yes	23	0
nan	Yes		No	0	0
ncarray	Yes		No	0	0
netcdf	Yes	1.0.6	Yes	16	0
ngspice	–		No	0	0
nlwing2	No	1.2.0	Yes	23	0
nnet	No	0.1.13	Yes	35	0
nurbs	Yes	1.3.10	Yes	73	18
ocs	Yes	0.1.3	Yes	11	0
oct2mat	No		No	0	0
octcdf	Yes		No	0	0
octclip	Yes	1.0.3	Yes	7	1
octgpr	No	1.2.1	Yes	6	0
octproj	Yes	1.1.2	Yes	11	0
ode	–	1.0.1	Yes	13	0
odebvp	No	1.0.6	Yes	5	0
odepkg	Yes	0.8.4	Yes	42	14
optics	Yes	0.1.1	Yes	48	0
optim	Yes		No	0	0
optiminterp	Yes		No	0	0
outliers	No	0.13.9	Yes	18	0
parallel	Yes	2.2.1	Yes	19	0
pdb	No		No	0	0
perl	–		No	0	0
plot	No	1.1.0	Yes	14	4
project-web	–		No	0	0
prony	–		No	0	0
quaternion	Yes	2.4.0	Yes	14	0
queueing	Yes	1.2.3	Yes	108	3
real2rgb	–		No	0	0
robotis	–	0.0.1	Yes	6	0
secs1d	Yes		No	0	0
secs2d	Yes		No	0	0
secs3d	Yes	0.0.1	Yes	0	0
signal	Yes	1.3.1	Yes	152	23
simp	No	1.1.0	Yes	34	0
sockets	Yes	1.2.0	Yes	4	0
soctcl	–		No	0	0
sparsersb	–		No	0	0
specfun	Yes	1.1.0	Yes	28	4
special-matrix	No	1.0.7	Yes	6	0
splines	Yes	1.2.7	Yes	16	1
statistics	Yes	1.2.4	Yes	119	8
stk	Yes		No	0	0
strings	Yes	1.1.0	Yes	10	0
struct	Yes	1.0.10	Yes	8	0
symband	No	1.0.10	Yes	12	0
symbolic	Yes		No	0	0
system-identification	–		No	0	0
tcl-octave	No		No	9	0
triangular	–		No	0	0
tsa	Yes		No	0	0
video	No		No	0	0
vrml	Yes	1.0.13	Yes	51	2
wavelet	–	0.1.0	Yes	9	0
windows	Yes		No	0	0
xraylib	No		No	0	0
zenity	No		No	14	0

Looking more closely at pkg(), it is possible to get the list of functions each package contains. With this list we can call test() on each, and collate the results. This should give more representative results. I will have a go at replacing the above mechanism.

Neil Hopcroft

A digital misfit

Octave packages test results

1 comment

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply